UFC 4-721-11.1
26 Nov 01
PROPOSAL RATING WORKSHEET
FACTOR 2-2
BUILDING SYSTEMS
Offeror: ________________________________________
Evaluator:_______________________________________
1. General: This factor is slightly less important factor in the technical analysis of the proposed solution
offered by the Offeror than Factor 2-1. In analyzing the various subfactors the evaluators must rate these
items with respect to material quality, durability, life cycle cost considerations, and on-going maintenance
required. Proposals which exceed the minimum requirements of the solicitation in these areas should be
rated above "AVERAGE". Particular attention should be paid to energy conservation, maintenance
considerations, and durability.
Subfactor a and b. These are the most important subfactors and are equal in weight.
Subfactor b, c, d, e, f, g, h, I, j, & k are equal and each slightly less important than subfactor a.
Subfactor l. This subfactor is a GO NO GO subfactor.
2. Subfactor Evaluations.
a. Building Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning Systems. Building HVAC systems are prime
consumer of energy and represent a key possibility to reducing the overall energy usage of the facilities.
Through a careful review of the proposal information the evaluators must keep energy conservation
considerations forefront in their analysis. Closely associated with the costs of operating the HVAC
equipment, the costs for maintenance of the equipment are a significant concern for the Installation staff.
Evaluators shall also consider the maintainability of the HVAC equipment as proposed and consider this
feature during the evaluation and the preparation of proposal strength and weakness summaries. Proposed
systems which meet the minimum requirements of the statement of work should not be rated above
"AVERAGE". Proposed materials and systems should be evaluated to determine their compliance with the
solicitation requirements. Proposal narrative and information provided concerning the HVAC systems
should address energy conservation as well as control of the various components.
Other Considerations: Access to equipment for maintenance, noise considerations from central equipment,
provision of individual space control, durability of materials proposed, suitability of
materials exposed to troop areas, integration into the facility wide control system
where applicable, outside air (ventilation) considerations, outside equipment locations
quality of equipment proposed
/__ / Excellent
/__ / Above Average
||content||
\ /1/ /__ / Average
||content||
\ /1/ /__ / Poor
/__ / Unacceptable
Appendix B Page 11