UFC 4-721-11.1
26 Nov 01
returned for a particular proposal, that proposal shall receive an "UNKNOWN" rating for each of the
questionnaires not received.
4. INDIVIDUAL PROPOSAL RATING WORKSHEETS
a. On the following pages individual worksheets are provided for use by the evaluators to review and rate
the individual proposals. During the consensus evaluation, a single "consensus rating" worksheet shall be
completed for each proposal and signed by all the evaluators. It is imperative that all comments and
supporting rational for the rating assigned be included on this consensus sheet. Comments are required to
support all ratings above or below "Satisfactory".
5. RATING METHODOLOGY
a. Proposals will be evaluated in each evaluation Factor based on the following rating scheme:
RATING
EXPLANATION
Unknown Performance Risk
Past performance information provided does not provide
sufficient depth and breadth of experience to allow a
definitive rating.
Outstanding/Very Low Performance Risk
Based on the offeror's performance record, no doubt exists
that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Above Average/Low Performance Risk
Based on the offeror's performance record, little doubt
exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required
effort.
Satisfactory/Moderate Performance Risk
Based on the offeror's performance record, some doubt
exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required
effort. Normal contractor emphasis should preclude any
problems.
Marginal/High Performance Risk
Based on the offeror's performance record, substantial
doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the
required effort.
Unsatisfactory/Very High Performance Risk
Based on the offeror's performance record, extreme doubt
exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required
effort.
b. Yes - No Items. Where the specific evaluation sheets indicate a YES NO Rating these items shall be
treated as informational items. They are included in the evaluation worksheets to assure a similar focus
among the evaluators and to ensure that individual evaluators do not overlook proposal information provided.
6. EVALUATION FACTORS
a. As indicated in Section 00120, PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND CONTRACT AWARD, the following
factors will be evaluated and rated for each proposal:
FACTOR 1-1: OFFEROR PAST PERFORMANCE: This factor is the most important factor in the evaluation
or Phase 1 proposals.
Appendix A Page 2
Previous Page
