Project Name
Project No. ___________
UFC 4-214-02, TEMF, 24 July 03
(2) Does the proposal include decorative plantings to enhance the appearance and environment of the
complex with respect to adjacent sites?
(3) Have the plant materials selected reflected those indicated in the Installation Design Guide?
(4) Has the landscaping plan been integrated into the Sustainable Design considerations addressed by
the proposer? Does the landscaping provided offer any environmental benefit to the Installation?
FACTOR 2-4: SITE ENGINEERING.
This factor evaluates the technical performance of the proposed site utility and exterior utility distribution
systems. The quality of the proposed design as well as the materials selected will be considered in this
item. Emphasis will be placed on durability, corrosion resistance, ease of maintenance, and life cycle
cost of materials selected. Consideration will be given to the suitability of the chosen materials for the
site soil conditions present. Site engineering will consider all aspects of the proposal beyond the
1500-mm line from all new facilities. The subfactors listed below will be considered as follows:
Subfactor a, b, & c are the most important factors and are all considered equal in importance.
Subfactors d, e, f, & g are all considered of equal importance and each is less important than subfactor a
a.
WATER SYSTEM Evaluates system design, material quality, and maintainability.
b. FUEL PIPING AND STORAGE Evaluates piping sizes, material quality, layout, accessibility, and
cutoff isolation.
c.
ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION Evaluates system design, material quality, and maintainability.
d. COMMUNICATIONS (Comm, Telephone, etc). Evaluates system design, material quality, and
maintainability.
e.
SANITARY SEWER Evaluates system design, material quality, and maintainability.
f.
STORM SEWER SYSTEM Evaluates system design, material quality, and maintainability.
g.
PAVEMENT DESIGN Evaluates pavement design, material quality, and maintainability.
FACTOR 2-5: SUSTAINABLE DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS.
The Offeror's shall include in their proposal a preliminary ranking of the sustainable design considerations
included in the proposal. This ranking shall be either a LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental
Design, by the U.S. Green Building Council) or a SPiRiT (Sustainable Project Rating Tool, by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers) ranking.
The successful proposal shall be required to complete a detailed
analysis on the final design which meets or exceeds the preliminary ranking established at proposal level.
Proposals must score at least a Bronze SPiRiT Level or a Certified LEED Level. The evaluation of this
factor shall be as follows:
FACTOR RATING
SpiRiT Level
LEED Level
Average
Bronze
Certified
High Average
Silver
Certified Silver
Above Average
Gold
Certified Gold
Excellent
Platinum
Certified Platinum
00120 - 11