Project Name
Project No. ___________
UFC 4-721-11.1, UEPH Complexes, 26 Nov 01
g.
This subfactor evaluates the provision of
communications and telephone systems in the facilities as well as the materials proposed for installation.
h.
Security Systems.
This subfactor evaluates the proposed security systems including design and
materials.
i.
Fire Protection and Detection Systems. This subfactor evaluates the proposed fire protection
and detection systems.
Included in this subfactor is the design as well as the materials proposed for
installation.
j.
Cable Television Systems. This subfactor evaluates the provision of cable television systems in
the facilities as well as the materials proposed for installation.
k. Plumbing Systems. This subfactor evaluates the provision of plumbing systems in the facilities as
well as the materials proposed for installation.
l. Building Structural Systems. This subfactor evaluates the structural systems and sub-systems
proposed for installation in the facilities. While no detail drawings or calculations are required or desired,
this subfactor will evaluate the narrative descriptions of the structural systems proposed.
FACTOR 2-3: SITE DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS.
This factor considers the layout and planning of the site and various specialties which comprise a good
site development plan. The goal and direction of the UEPH Complex program is to produce a "campus
like" setting and to encourage a positive relationship between the site development and the student
needs. All elements of site design will be considered in this factor, with the exception of the design and
materials utilized for utility systems which will be evaluated under a different factor. The following
subfactors shall be considered in evaluation this factor. The levels of importance are as follows:
Subfactor a is considered the most important subfactor.
Subfactor b is slightly less important than subfactor a.
Subfactor c is slightly less important than subfactor b.
Sufactor d, e, f, g, & h are each equal in importance and are significantly less important than subfactor c.
a. Area Development Plan. This subfactor evaluates the overall development concept proposed in the
Offeror's plan with respect to the placement and orientation of the facilities, parking areas, pedestrian
ways, circulation paths, site lighting, and other aspects which comprise the overall site development.
Proposals which reflect the design intent and direction as outlined in the Statement of Work will receive
the most consideration during the evaluation process.
b. Force Protection Considerations. This subfactor evaluates the inclusion of the site restraints
imposed by the Force Protection requirements in the Statement of Work into the Offeror's proposal.
The proposal must address this subfactor specifically.
If a proposal is rated "unacceptable" in this
subfactor the proposal may be eliminated from further consideration.
c. Pedestrian Circulation. This subfactor evaluates the design of the pedestrian walkways and
sidewalks to facilitate movement of pedestrians from one facility to another. The pedestrian walkways
and sidewalks developed in the Offeror's proposal must represent an extension of the existing adjacent
systems. Some items for consideration in evaluating this subfactor are as follows:
(1) Are all parking areas served by sidewalks
(2) Does the proposed sidewalk system provide direct, convienent access to all facilities from the
associated parking areas?
(3) Has a sidewalk system around and between facilities been provided?
(4) Is the new sidewalk system an extension of the existing adjacent systems?
00120 - 9