Project Name
Project No. ___________
UFC 4-721-11.1, UEPH Complexes, 26 Nov 01
ABOVE AVERAGE: The offeror exceeds the scope of the solicitation in most aspects of the particular
factor or sub-factor.
The offeror provides an advantage in key areas or exceeds performance or
capability requirements, but has some areas of improvement remaining.
||content||
\ /1/
AVERAGE: The offeror matches the scope of the solicitation in most aspects of the particular factor or
sub-factor. The offeror meets the performance or capability requirements of the element but not in a way
advantageous to the Government. There is room for improvement in this element.
||content||
\ /1/
POOR: The offeror does not meet the minimum scope of the solicitation for the particular factor or sub-
factor.
The offeror does not include any advantages and does not meet the minimal performance or
capability requirements for this element.
The offeror contains many apparent weakness and requires
improvement.
UNACCEPTABLE: The offeror fails to meet the scope of the solicitation in all aspects of the factor or
sub-factor or has not submitted any information to address this evaluated item. The offeror does not
include any advantages in any areas of the element and does not meet the minimum performance or
capability requirements of this factor or sub-factor. The proposal includes large apparent weaknesses
and the proposal will require extensive modifications to come into compliance with the minimum
requirements of the solicitation.
||content||
\
b. Evaluation Methodology. The Government evaluation team will consider all information provided in
the Phase 2 proposals individually. Once these individual analyses are completed, the team will meet
and determine a rating for each of the evaluation factors for Phase 2 by consensus decision. After each
of the Factors for each of the proposals are rated, the team will develop, again by consensus, a final
overall rating for the Phase 2 proposal.
c. Narrative Consensus Comments: The consensus evaluation will identify and document proposal
Deficiencies, Strengths, Weaknesses, and Uncertainties.
Definitions:
Proposal Deficiency: A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a
combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful
contract performance to an unacceptable level. Examples of deficiencies include statements
by the offeror that it cannot or will not meet a requirement; an approach that clearly does not
met a requirement, or an omission of data required to assess compliance with a Government
requirement.
Proposal Strength: An aspect of a proposal that appreciably decreases the risk of
unsuccessful contract performance or that represents a significant benefit to the Government.
Proposal Weakness: A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract
performance. A "significant weakness" in the proposal is a flaw that appreciably increases the
risk of unsuccessful performance.
Uncertainty: Any aspect of the proposal for which the intent of the offeror is unclear because
there may be more than one way to interpret the offer or because inconsistencies in the offer
indicate that there may be an error, omission, or mistake. Examples include a mistake in
calculation or measurement and contradictory statements.
00120 - 5
Previous Page
