Project Name
Project No. ___________
UFC 4-721-11.1, UEPH Complexes, 26 Nov 01
required effort.
preclude any problems.
Marginal/High Performance Risk
Based on the offeror's performance record, substantial
doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the
required effort.
Unsatisfactory/Very High Performance Risk
Based on the offeror's performance record, extreme
doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the
required effort.
b. Offeror Past Performance: The Government will evaluate the satisfaction of the customers in the
example projects identified by the Offeror and from which Past Performance Evaluation Questionnaires
have been received. The Government may contact the points of contact indicated to assure validity of
the received questionnaires. The Government may contact sources other than those provided by the
Offeror for information with respect to past performance.
These other sources may include ACASS
(Architect-Engineer Contract Administration Support System), CCASS (Construction Contractor Appraisal
Support System), telephone interviews, and Government personnel personal knowledge of contractor
performance capability. Offerors will be provided with an opportunity to address any negative past
performance information on which the offeror has not previously had such an opportunity. The following
areas of major consideration will be determined from evaluation of all sources of past performance
information and an overall rating provided:
(1) Quality of the Product Produced. Based on the information provided in the questionnaire and other
information the Government will access the quality of the actual constructions produced and the
standards of workmanship exhibited by the Offeror's team.
(2) Adherence to Project Schedule. The Government will evaluate all information available with respect
to the Offerors completing past projects within the scheduled completion times.
(3) Management Processes. The Government will evaluate all information available with respect to the
Offerors on-site management of construction activities, subcontractors, and any other project
management consideration.
c. Offeror Project Key Personnel. The Government will evaluate and rate the Key Personnel identified
in the Phase 1 proposal package. The resumes and levels of responsibility of the principal managers
and technical personnel who will be directly responsible for the day-to-day design and construction
activities will be evaluated. Information should include, as a minimum, the project manager; the project
architect; landscape architect; the engineers responsible for civil, electrical, mechanical and structural
design; the quality control manager; and the construction manager. Data should indicate whether each
individual has had a significant part in any of the project examples cited. If reassignment of personnel is
considered possible, the names and resumes of the alternative professionals for each assignment will be
evaluated. Additional consideration will be given to individuals who have past experience with Corps of
Engineers construction project operations and who have completed the Corps sponsored Quality Control
Class.
d. Technical Approach Narrative.
The Government will evaluate the overall understanding of the
design-build process as well as the Offeror's implementation plans to utilize "fast track" procedures on this
project. Particular attention will be paid to the inclusion of the major construction subcontractors during
the design process as well as the definition of the roles and responsibilities of the various subcontractors.
Offerors are cautioned that this narrative shall not exceed five (5) pages and that the Government review
staff will review and evaluate only the information contained on the first five pages in this section.
Information beyond the five (5) page limit will be ignored.
e. Relevant Experience. The Government will evaluate the example projects provided by the Offeror
to evaluate and rate the recent experience of the Offeror in similar construction and/or design-build
00120 - 3