Project Name
Project No. ___________
UFC 4-721-11.1, UEPH Complexes, 26 Nov 01
d. Relative Importance of Factors.
Refer to paragraph 1 in this section for delineation of factor relative
importance.
/1/
FACTOR 2-1: BUILDING FUNCTION AND ASTHETICS.
This factor considers the overall functional layout and interaction of the spaces in the facilities as well as
the "appeal" of the facility considering interior as well as exterior considerations. The subfactors to be
considered deal with the planning and design of the spaces with respect to soldier living and working
conditions and the operations of a UEPH Facility.
Closely associated with the functional layout of the
spaces and facilities, this factor considers the asthetics of the interior areas as well as the exterior
finishes and design of the facilities, up to and including pedestrian ways and overall environment created
by the design proposed.
The subfactors described below will be evaluated in the following order of
importance:
Subfactor a and b are "GO/NO GO" factors and will be rated as pass/fail without an adjectival
component.
Subfactor c is considered the most important subfactor
Subfactor d is slightly less important than subfactor c.
a.
APPROPRIATE FACILITIES
From an overall perspective, has the proposal included all the required facilities as described in the
Statement of Work?
b.
MINIMUM SPACE AND FACILITY SIZE
Has the proposal included all the mandatory spaces in response to the requirements set forth in the
Statement of Work?
For each of the spaces with a minimum or maximum size limitation, has the
proposal complied with these requirements?
Insufficient information contained in the proposal to
evaluate this item will be considered a "NO GO" and will represent a "FAIL" rating.
c. FUNCTIONAL ARRANGEMENT The following items will be considered in the evaluation of the
functional arrangement of the various facilities:
[Design District shall edit the following subfactor items to include only those facility types which are
included in the project.]
(1A) UEPH (Barracks Buildings)
(a) Does the building floor plan provide space arrangement well suited to the mission of the facility?
(b) Does the building floor plan provide acceptable life safety and fire safety measures?
Is the Life
Safety Analysis for the facility acceptable and in conformance with the Statement of Work requirements?
(c) Evaluate the Offeror's floor plan with respect to privacy considerations for the soldiers.
(d) Does the Offeror's floor plan demonstrate compliance with the mandatory requirements for
furnishings while allowing suitable space for circulation and other requirements?
(1B) Company Operations Facilities
(a) Does the building floor plan provide space arrangement well suited to the mission of the facility?
(b) Does the building floor plan provide acceptable life safety and fire safety measures?
Is the Life
Safety Analysis for the facility acceptable and in conformance with the Statement of Work requirements?
(c) Evaluate the Offeror's floor plan with respect to the functional and spatial relationship requirements
established in the Statement of Work.
00120 - 6