Project Name
Project No. ___________
UFC 4-721-11.1, UEPH Complexes, 26 Nov 01
projects. The examples projects which most closely resemble the project identified in this solicitation will
receive the highest consideration.
If the Offeror cannot provide suitable relevant experience and the
Government staff considers the provided information to basically indicate that the Offeror has no relevant
experience, this Offeror shall be rated as satisfactory.
Lack of relevant experience will not be rated
favorably or unfavorably.
f. Evaluation Methodology. The Government evaluation team will consider all information provided in
the Phase 1 proposal individually.
Once these individual analyses are completed, the team will meet
and determine a rating for each of the evaluation factors for Phase 1 by consensus decision. After each
of the Factors for each of the proposals are rated, the team will develop, again by consensus, a final
overall rating for the Phase 1 proposal. Up to five Offerors will continue into Phase 2 of the project. No
proposals which receive an overall rating of Unsatisfactory or Marginal will be forwarded to Phase 2
regardless of the total number of proposals received.
||content||
\
g. Narrative Consensus Comments: The consensus evaluation will identify and document proposal
Deficiencies, Strengths, Weaknesses, and Uncertainties.
Definitions:
Proposal Deficiency: A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a
combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful
contract performance to an unacceptable level. Examples of deficiencies include statements
by the offeror that it cannot or will not meet a requirement; an approach that clearly does not
met a requirement, or an omission of data required to assess compliance with a Government
requirement.
Proposal Strength: An aspect of a proposal that appreciably decreases the risk of
unsuccessful contract performance or that represents a significant benefit to the Government.
Proposal Weakness: A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract
performance. A "significant weakness" in the proposal is a flaw that appreciably increases the
risk of unsuccessful performance.
Uncertainty: Any aspect of the proposal for which the intent of the offeror is unclear because
there may be more than one way to interpret the offer or because inconsistencies in the offer
indicate that there may be an error, omission, or mistake. Examples include a mistake in
calculation or measurement and contradictory statements.
/1/
5. PHASE 2 EVALUATION PROCEDURES AND CRITERIA:
a. General.
The proposals from the Offerors who reach Phase 2 will be evaluated by a team of
Government staff to determine compliance with this solicitation (as a minimum), and to evaluate the
quality of the proposed materials, methods, and procedures. Each of the evaluation Factors for Phase 2
will be evaluated by the Government and a final overall rating for the proposals shall be determined by
consensus of the Government evaluation team.
The rating scheme for Phase 2 of the process is as
shown below:
EXCELLENT: The offeror greatly exceeds the scope of the solicitation requirements in all aspects of the
particular factor or sub-factor.
The offeror also provides significant advantage(s) and exceeds the
solicitation requirements in performance or capability in an advantageous way and has no apparent or
significant weaknesses or omissions.
00120 - 4
Previous Page
