UFC 4-721-11.1
26 Nov 01
11-2.3 Corrected Documents. The corrected documents will be the basis for re-evaluating the ratings
developed during the phase 2 evaluation.
11-2.3.1 In-house technical reviewers and in-house members of the evaluation team will determine the
need for adjustments to the ratings for the corrected items.
11-2.3.2 Re-adjust the rating of each proposal based on the results of discussions. For minor changes,
telephone coordination with participating members of the evaluation team may be adequate. Brief them
on the changes made by offerors and the recommendations of the in-house technical reviewers and
evaluation team members. Revise rating sheets to achieve consensus of all evaluation team members.
11-2.4 Competitive Range. See FAR 15.306 (reference 11-3) for a definition of the competitive range.
When discussions are initiated with any offeror, they must be conducted with all offerors in the
competitive range. If requirements are revised for one offeror, they must be revised for all offerors. This
is done by amending the solicitation which may be done throughout the negotiation phase, see FAR
15.206 (reference 11-4).
11-2.5 Wage Rates. If applicable wage rates will expire prior to contract award, new wage rates should
be obtained. Offerors should be advised so that these new wage rates must be considered. See FAR
22.404-6 (reference 11-5) for additional guidance.
11-2.6 At the conclusion of discussions, each offeror will be requested to submit a final Proposal
Revision which shall document any changes to the proposal prices or technical information. The offerors
will be given a reasonable period
||content||
\ of time /1/ to make to respond to any remaining issues needing
clarification. No indication will be made to any offeror of a price, which must be met to obtain further
consideration except that the Government may emphasize the available funding limit or cost ceiling for
award.
11-3 SOURCE SELECTION.
11-3.1 Formal source selection in accordance with FAR 15.302 (reference 11-6) is permitted but not
required. After discussions are completed, proposals are re-evaluated and the proposal most
advantageous to the Government, based on technical and price factors identified in the RFP, is selected.
The USACE activity, installation using activity, and Major Army Command (MACOM) should all have a
voice in source selection, but the final selection shall be made by the Source Selection Authority.
11-3.2 Criteria. The following information should be considered in source selection:
11-3.2.1 Offeror's
||content||
\ name /1/.
11-3.2.2 Original proposals as modified by discussions.
11-3.2.3 Maximum price allowed under the RFP.
11-3.2.4 Basic proposal price.
11-3.2.5 Prices of options.
11-3.2.6 Price and number of soldier rooms provided if the basic proposal and options are exercised.
This information is required to determine if basic and option prices are balanced.
11-3.2.7 Overall proposal rating.
11-3.2.7.1 If basic only is exercised.
11-2
Previous Page
